CLF
Price
$9.72
Change
-$0.37 (-3.67%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
15 days until earnings call
GGB
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.03 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.93B
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLF vs GGB

Header iconCLF vs GGB Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs GGBBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$9.72
Change-$0.37 (-3.67%)
Volume$12.61M
Capitalization4.8B
Gerdau SA
Price$2.90
Change-$0.03 (-1.02%)
Volume$108.48K
Capitalization5.93B
CLF vs GGB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. GGB commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Hold and GGB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $10.09 vs. GGB: $2.93)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. GGB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 83% vs. GGB: 79%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $4.8B vs. GGB: $5.93B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $4.8B. GGB’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $5.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $28.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGGB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GGB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGB is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GGB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGB is a better buy in the short-term than CLF.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а -1.27% price change this week, while GGB (@Steel) price change was +5.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

GGB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.01% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGB($5.94B) has a higher market cap than CLF($4.8B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than GGB: CLF (145.67) vs GGB (7.69). CLF YTD gains are higher at: 7.340 vs. GGB (1.736). GGB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.7B vs. CLF (745M). GGB has more cash in the bank: 8.83B vs. CLF (39M). CLF has less debt than GGB: CLF (3.77B) vs GGB (13.8B). GGB has higher revenues than CLF: GGB (64.9B) vs CLF (20B).
CLFGGBCLF / GGB
Capitalization4.8B5.94B81%
EBITDA745M9.7B8%
Gain YTD7.3401.736423%
P/E Ratio145.677.691,895%
Revenue20B64.9B31%
Total Cash39M8.83B0%
Total Debt3.77B13.8B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs GGB: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
GGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1423
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8776
SMR RATING
1..100
9262
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6479
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGB's Valuation (6) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (89). This means that GGB’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (87). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's SMR Rating (62) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (92). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (79). This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (16). This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFGGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
-1.75%
STLD - CLF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
NUE - CLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
MTUS - CLF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
CMC - CLF
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
RS - CLF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More

GGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGB has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGB jumps, then SID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGB
1D Price
Change %
GGB100%
+3.53%
SID - GGB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
MT - GGB
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
TX - GGB
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
CMC - GGB
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
CLF - GGB
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
More