CLF
Price
$13.35
Change
+$0.44 (+3.41%)
Updated
Jan 13, 02:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.35B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CMC
Price
$74.61
Change
+$1.62 (+2.22%)
Updated
Jan 13, 02:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.1B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs CMC

Header iconCLF vs CMC Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs CMCBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$13.35
Change+$0.44 (+3.41%)
Volume$4.54K
Capitalization7.35B
Commercial Metals
Price$74.61
Change+$1.62 (+2.22%)
Volume$5.74K
Capitalization8.1B
CLF vs CMC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. CMC commentary
Jan 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Buy and CMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 13, 2026
Stock price -- (CLF: $12.91 vs. CMC: $72.99)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. CMC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 89% vs. CMC: 136%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $7.35B vs. CMC: $8.1B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $7.35B. CMC’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $8.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $37.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $6.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMC is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than CMC.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а -2.20% price change this week, while CMC (@Steel) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

CMC is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+2.65% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMC($8.1B) has a higher market cap than CLF($7.36B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than CMC: CLF (145.67) vs CMC (18.91). CMC YTD gains are higher at: 5.446 vs. CLF (-2.786). CMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 439M vs. CLF (-330M). CMC has less debt than CLF: CMC (1.35B) vs CLF (8.04B). CLF has higher revenues than CMC: CLF (18.6B) vs CMC (7.8B).
CLFCMCCLF / CMC
Capitalization7.36B8.1B91%
EBITDA-330M439M-75%
Gain YTD-2.7865.446-51%
P/E Ratio145.6718.91770%
Revenue18.6B7.8B239%
Total Cash66MN/A-
Total Debt8.04B1.35B594%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs CMC: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
CMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8310
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10018
SMR RATING
1..100
9689
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
397
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMC's Valuation (19) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (90) in the Steel industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (100) in the Steel industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's SMR Rating (89) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as CLF (96) in the Steel industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as CLF (48) in the Steel industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMC (97) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFCMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BALFX38.430.07
+0.18%
American Funds American Balanced F1
ICEIX23.71N/A
N/A
Nomura International Core Equity I
BALPX9.92N/A
N/A
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Inv A
CLIQX23.57-0.02
-0.08%
Lone Peak Value Super Institutional
CCERX28.81-0.03
-0.10%
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core R

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
+1.18%
NUE - CLF
66%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
STLD - CLF
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CMC - CLF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
RS - CLF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
WS - CLF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More

CMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMC has been closely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMC jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMC
1D Price
Change %
CMC100%
+0.73%
STLD - CMC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
NUE - CMC
70%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
RS - CMC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
MTUS - CMC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
WS - CMC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More