Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLDL vs QLD
CLDL vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLDL vs. QLD commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLDL is a Hold and QLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 8.89B vs. CLDL (5.57M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than CLDL: QLD (10.544) vs CLDL (9.126). CLDL was incepted earlier than QLD: CLDL (4 years) vs QLD (19 years). QLD (0.95) and CLDL (0.96) have comparable expense ratios . QLD has a higher turnover CLDL (20.00) vs CLDL (20.00).
| CLDL | QLD | CLDL / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.126 | 10.544 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 5.57M | 8.89B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.95 | 101% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 24.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 0.22 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLDL | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLDL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLDL has been closely correlated with DOCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLDL jumps, then DOCN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLDL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLDL | 100% | +4.44% | ||
| DOCN - CLDL | 72% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| CRWD - CLDL | 71% Closely correlated | +3.63% | ||
| NOW - CLDL | 70% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| ZS - CLDL | 68% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| ADSK - CLDL | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
More | ||||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 81% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| META - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ARM - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| NXPI - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||