CLCMF
Price
$2.87
Change
+$0.97 (+51.05%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.19B
HTWSF
Price
$1.63
Change
-$0.07 (-4.12%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLCMF vs HTWSF

Header iconCLCMF vs HTWSF Comparison
Open Charts CLCMF vs HTWSFBanner chart's image
Sinch AB
Price$2.87
Change+$0.97 (+51.05%)
Volume$75
Capitalization2.19B
Helios Towers
Price$1.63
Change-$0.07 (-4.12%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.22B
CLCMF vs HTWSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLCMF vs. HTWSF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLCMF is a Hold and HTWSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLCMF: $2.87 vs. HTWSF: $1.63)
Brand notoriety: CLCMF and HTWSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLCMF: 100% vs. HTWSF: 10%
Market capitalization -- CLCMF: $2.19B vs. HTWSF: $1.22B
CLCMF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $2.19B. HTWSF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHTWSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HTWSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HTWSF is a better buy in the long-term than CLCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTWSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HTWSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CLCMF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HTWSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.70% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLCMF($2.19B) has a higher market cap than HTWSF($1.22B). HTWSF (52.336) and CLCMF (50.947) have similar YTD gains . CLCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.63B vs. HTWSF (113M). CLCMF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. HTWSF (389M). HTWSF has less debt than CLCMF: HTWSF (1.47B) vs CLCMF (11B). CLCMF has higher revenues than HTWSF: CLCMF (28.5B) vs HTWSF (502M).
CLCMFHTWSFCLCMF / HTWSF
Capitalization2.19B1.22B179%
EBITDA2.63B113M2,323%
Gain YTD50.94752.33697%
P/E Ratio35.12N/A-
Revenue28.5B502M5,677%
Total Cash1.55B389M397%
Total Debt11B1.47B748%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLCMF: Fundamental Ratings
CLCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLCMFHTWSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAAKX24.190.20
+0.83%
MoA All America Fund
WWSCX16.840.13
+0.78%
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
WCMRX26.410.15
+0.57%
WCM Focused International Growth Inv
IVOIX19.370.06
+0.31%
Macquarie Mid Cap Income Opps I
TWIEX13.96-0.03
-0.21%
American Century International Gr Inv

CLCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCMF and TIAOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCMF and TIAOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCMF
1D Price
Change %
CLCMF100%
N/A
TIAOF - CLCMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CLCMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIF - CLCMF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHRYY - CLCMF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
CVHSY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HTWSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and CLCMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and CLCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTWSF
1D Price
Change %
HTWSF100%
N/A
CLCMF - HTWSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFTBY - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
MTNOY - HTWSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
LLEIF - HTWSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FYBR - HTWSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More