CLCMF
Price
$3.13
Change
+$0.52 (+19.92%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.56B
HTWSF
Price
$1.82
Change
+$0.05 (+2.82%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLCMF vs HTWSF

Header iconCLCMF vs HTWSF Comparison
Open Charts CLCMF vs HTWSFBanner chart's image
Sinch AB
Price$3.13
Change+$0.52 (+19.92%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.56B
Helios Towers
Price$1.82
Change+$0.05 (+2.82%)
Volume$6.65K
Capitalization1.93B
CLCMF vs HTWSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLCMF vs. HTWSF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLCMF is a Hold and HTWSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CLCMF: $3.13 vs. HTWSF: $1.82)
Brand notoriety: CLCMF and HTWSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLCMF: 13% vs. HTWSF: 262%
Market capitalization -- CLCMF: $2.56B vs. HTWSF: $1.93B
CLCMF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $2.56B. HTWSF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHTWSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HTWSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLCMF and HTWSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLCMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTWSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLCMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HTWSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTWSF is a better buy in the short-term than CLCMF.

Price Growth

CLCMF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HTWSF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.28% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLCMF($2.56B) has a higher market cap than HTWSF($1.93B). CLCMF has higher P/E ratio than HTWSF: CLCMF (134.09) vs HTWSF (23.95). HTWSF YTD gains are higher at: 70.093 vs. CLCMF (64.737). CLCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.01B vs. HTWSF (487M). CLCMF has more cash in the bank: 717M vs. HTWSF (184M). HTWSF has less debt than CLCMF: HTWSF (1.95B) vs CLCMF (5.96B). CLCMF has higher revenues than HTWSF: CLCMF (28.5B) vs HTWSF (820M).
CLCMFHTWSFCLCMF / HTWSF
Capitalization2.56B1.93B133%
EBITDA3.01B487M618%
Gain YTD64.73770.09392%
P/E Ratio134.0923.95560%
Revenue28.5B820M3,476%
Total Cash717M184M390%
Total Debt5.96B1.95B305%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLCMF: Fundamental Ratings
CLCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLCMFHTWSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCILX18.550.09
+0.49%
BlackRock International Inv C
RMFAX60.210.07
+0.12%
American Funds American Mutual R1
NWHGX16.33N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val R6
AAGOX109.57-0.01
-0.01%
Alger Large Cap Growth I-2
AFDAX56.25-0.14
-0.25%
American Century Large Cap Equity A

CLCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCMF and TIAOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCMF and TIAOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCMF
1D Price
Change %
CLCMF100%
N/A
TIAOF - CLCMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CLCMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
BZQIF - CLCMF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHRYY - CLCMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-14.41%
More

HTWSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and CLCMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and CLCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTWSF
1D Price
Change %
HTWSF100%
+2.82%
CLCMF - HTWSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFTBY - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
MTNOY - HTWSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
LLEIF - HTWSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FYBR - HTWSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More