Advertisement
CLCMF vs HTWSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLCMF is a Hold and HTWSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHTWSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HTWSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HTWSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- HTWSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLCMF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HTWSF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.96% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CLCMF | HTWSF | CLCMF / HTWSF | |
| Capitalization | 2.64B | 1.79B | 147% |
| EBITDA | 3.01B | 487M | 618% |
| Gain YTD | 50.947 | 53.738 | 95% |
| P/E Ratio | 134.09 | 21.64 | 619% |
| Revenue | 28.5B | 820M | 3,476% |
| Total Cash | 717M | 184M | 390% |
| Total Debt | 5.96B | 1.95B | 305% |
CLCMF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CLCMF | HTWSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 24% | 3 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 26% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
CLCMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCMF and TIAOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCMF and TIAOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLCMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLCMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TIAOF - CLCMF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HTWSF - CLCMF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BZQIF - CLCMF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHRYY - CLCMF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CVHSY - CLCMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HTWSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and CLCMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and CLCMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTWSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTWSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CLCMF - HTWSF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SFTBY - HTWSF | 23% Poorly correlated | +6.46% | ||
| MTNOY - HTWSF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| LLEIF - HTWSF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FYBR - HTWSF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||