Advertisement
CLCMF vs CVHSY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLCMF is a Buy and CVHSY is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCVHSY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CVHSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLCMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVHSY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLCMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CVHSY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLCMF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CVHSY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -0.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.33%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+0.34% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CLCMF | CVHSY | CLCMF / CVHSY | |
| Capitalization | 2.63B | 921M | 285% |
| EBITDA | 3.01B | 1.25T | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 86.842 | -16.373 | -530% |
| P/E Ratio | 134.09 | 163.52 | 82% |
| Revenue | 28.5B | 5.17T | 1% |
| Total Cash | 717M | 375B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 5.96B | 4.74T | 0% |
CLCMF | CVHSY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CVHSY's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCMF (92). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew similarly to CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.
CVHSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLCMF (100). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.
CVHSY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCMF (95). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew similarly to CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.
CLCMF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CVHSY (43). This means that CLCMF’s stock grew similarly to CVHSY’s over the last 12 months.
CVHSY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLCMF (98). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.
| CLCMF | CVHSY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
CLCMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCMF and TIAOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCMF and TIAOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLCMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLCMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TIAOF - CLCMF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FYBR - CLCMF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CGEAF - CLCMF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| CVHSY - CLCMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BGAOY - CLCMF | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.75% | ||
More | ||||
CVHSY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CVHSY and IIJIF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVHSY and IIJIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVHSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVHSY | 100% | N/A | ||
| IIJIF - CVHSY | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TEO - CVHSY | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.72% | ||
| BGAOY - CVHSY | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.75% | ||
| TV - CVHSY | 20% Poorly correlated | +4.07% | ||
| CGEAF - CVHSY | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||