CLCFF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.12M
LVZPF
Price
$3.43
Change
-$0.09 (-2.56%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.77B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLCFF vs LVZPF

Header iconCLCFF vs LVZPF Comparison
Open Charts CLCFF vs LVZPFBanner chart's image
Christina Lake Cannabis
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization8.12M
Livzon Pharmaceutical Group
Price$3.43
Change-$0.09 (-2.56%)
Volume$1.19K
Capitalization4.77B
CLCFF vs LVZPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLCFF vs. LVZPF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLCFF is a Hold and LVZPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CLCFF: $0.03 vs. LVZPF: $3.43)
Brand notoriety: CLCFF and LVZPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLCFF: 6% vs. LVZPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CLCFF: $8.12M vs. LVZPF: $4.77B
CLCFF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $8.12M. LVZPF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $4.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $68.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLCFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVZPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVZPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLCFF is a better buy in the long-term than LVZPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLCFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CLCFF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +23.17% price change this week, while LVZPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +68.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+6.26% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVZPF($4.77B) has a higher market cap than CLCFF($8.12M). LVZPF has higher P/E ratio than CLCFF: LVZPF (11.34) vs CLCFF (4.81). CLCFF YTD gains are higher at: 132.933 vs. LVZPF (0.000). LVZPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3B vs. CLCFF (3.25M). LVZPF has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. CLCFF (1.86M). CLCFF has less debt than LVZPF: CLCFF (10.3M) vs LVZPF (3.86B). LVZPF has higher revenues than CLCFF: LVZPF (11.8B) vs CLCFF (13.6M).
CLCFFLVZPFCLCFF / LVZPF
Capitalization8.12M4.77B0%
EBITDA3.25M3B0%
Gain YTD132.9330.000-
P/E Ratio4.8111.3442%
Revenue13.6M11.8B0%
Total Cash1.86M10.9B0%
Total Debt10.3M3.86B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVZPF: Fundamental Ratings
LVZPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLCFFLVZPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONLN57.680.18
+0.31%
ProShares Online Retail ETF
LDRT25.22N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF
SMMV42.33-0.04
-0.09%
iShares MSCI USA Sm-Cp Min Vol Fctr ETF
JANP31.01-0.04
-0.13%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jan
BIZD15.90-0.19
-1.18%
VanEck BDC Income ETF

CLCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCFF and ALKS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCFF and ALKS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCFF
1D Price
Change %
CLCFF100%
-2.67%
ALKS - CLCFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
RGC - CLCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
LVZPF - CLCFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYEX - CLCFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEDSF - CLCFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LVZPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVZPF has been loosely correlated with LIFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LVZPF jumps, then LIFD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVZPF
1D Price
Change %
LVZPF100%
N/A
LIFD - LVZPF
33%
Loosely correlated
-4.11%
TLPH - LVZPF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
UPC - LVZPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
CLCFF - LVZPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
VRNOF - LVZPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-19.33%
More