Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WEBCX
CLBFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$37.18
Change-$0.14 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.61B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.68M
CLBFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. WEBCX (33.7M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: CLBFX (1.97) vs WEBCX (1.21). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: CLBFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. WEBCX (-0.41). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.55 vs. WEBCX (0.19).
| CLBFX | WEBCX | CLBFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.435 | 5.297 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256B | 33.7M | 759,644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.21 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | -0.41 | -1,723% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.26 | 4.97 | 649% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.55 | 0.19 | 20,865% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.40 | -4.13 | -2,141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement