Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WEBCX
CLBFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$35.51
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.19
Change-$0.09 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.27M
CLBFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. WEBCX (33.3M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: CLBFX (2.07) vs WEBCX (1.23). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: CLBFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. WEBCX (-1.35). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.30 vs. WEBCX (-0.32).
| CLBFX | WEBCX | CLBFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.519 | 1.080 | 419% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 244B | 33.3M | 732,733% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.23 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | -1.35 | -402% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.29 | 9.91 | 346% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.30 | -0.32 | -12,868% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.68 | -12.08 | -610% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement