Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WEBCX
CLBFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$37.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.52
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.91M
CLBFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. WEBCX (33.9M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: CLBFX (1.99) vs WEBCX (1.22). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: CLBFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.40 vs. WEBCX (1.00). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.59 vs. WEBCX (1.18).
| CLBFX | WEBCX | CLBFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.111 | 4.700 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 254B | 33.9M | 749,263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.22 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.40 | 1.00 | 1,038% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.42 | 9.61 | 379% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.59 | 1.18 | 3,600% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.10 | -7.83 | -1,036% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement