Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WEBCX
CLBFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$38.37
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.75B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.83M
CLBFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and WEBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. WEBCX (33.8M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: CLBFX (1.94) vs WEBCX (1.19). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: CLBFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.93 vs. WEBCX (-0.84). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.10 vs. WEBCX (3.55).
| CLBFX | WEBCX | CLBFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.937 | 6.751 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 33.8M | 778,107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.19 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.93 | -0.84 | -939% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.34 | 19.42 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.10 | 3.55 | 1,329% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.95 | -0.22 | -44,615% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement