Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WEBAX
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WEBAX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$38.37
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
Price$10.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.81M
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WEBAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and WEBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. WEBAX (33.8M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: CLBFX (1.94) vs WEBAX (1.20). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WEBAX (34 years). WEBAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBAX (36.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: CLBFX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.93 vs. WEBAX (-0.85). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.10 vs. WEBAX (3.40).
| CLBFX | WEBAX | CLBFX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.937 | 6.818 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 33.8M | 775,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.20 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.93 | -0.85 | -931% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.34 | 19.39 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.10 | 3.40 | 1,385% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.95 | 0.63 | 15,661% |