Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WEBAX
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WEBAX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$38.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
Price$10.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.51M
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WEBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and WEBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. WEBAX (33.5M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: CLBFX (1.89) vs WEBAX (1.18). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WEBAX (34 years). WEBAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBAX (36.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: CLBFX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.84 vs. WEBAX (-1.94). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.11 vs. WEBAX (0.14).
| CLBFX | WEBAX | CLBFX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.767 | 6.919 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266B | 33.5M | 794,030% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.18 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.84 | -1.94 | -456% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.03 | 17.38 | 299% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.11 | 0.14 | 31,377% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.64 | -3.28 | -2,798% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement