Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WEBAX
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WEBAX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$38.22
Change-$0.06 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
Price$9.57
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.99M
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WEBAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and WEBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. WEBAX (32M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: CLBFX (2.08) vs WEBAX (1.35). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WEBAX (34 years). WEBAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). WEBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. CLBFX (44.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: CLBFX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.42 vs. WEBAX (-3.37). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.53 vs. WEBAX (-10.67).
| CLBFX | WEBAX | CLBFX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.357 | 1.592 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270B | 32M | 843,750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 1.35 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.42 | -3.37 | -427% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.39 | 3.76 | 1,022% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.53 | -10.67 | -370% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.76 | -2.23 | -4,734% |