Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs TSUMX
CLBFX vs TSUMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs TSUMX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$37.88
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.73B
Thornburg Summit I
Price$14.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.39M
CLBFX vs TSUMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. TSUMX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and TSUMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 258B vs. TSUMX (97.4M). TSUMX (2.03) and CLBFX (1.94) have matching dividends . CLBFX was incepted earlier than TSUMX: CLBFX (23 years) vs TSUMX (7 years). TSUMX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). TSUMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.54 vs. CLBFX (44.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSUMX: CLBFX (250) vs TSUMX (2500000). TSUMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.69 vs. CLBFX (10.11). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.70 vs. TSUMX (32.35).
| CLBFX | TSUMX | CLBFX / TSUMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.71 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.17 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.495 | 14.180 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258B | 97.4M | 264,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 2.03 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 12.69 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.65 | 43.28 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.70 | 32.35 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement