Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs PABAX
CLBFX vs PABAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs PABAX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$39.42
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.37B
CLBFX vs PABAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. PABAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and PABAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. PABAX (2.37B). PABAX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: PABAX (3.19) vs CLBFX (1.86). CLBFX was incepted earlier than PABAX: CLBFX (23 years) vs PABAX (32 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. CLBFX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: PABAX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. PABAX (3.47). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. PABAX (20.64).
| CLBFX | PABAX | CLBFX / PABAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.391 | 14.098 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268B | 2.37B | 11,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 3.19 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 3.47 | 291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.93 | 32.84 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 20.64 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.43 | 44.68 | 211% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement