Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs PABAX
CLBFX vs PABAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs PABAX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$39.72
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.58
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
CLBFX vs PABAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. PABAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a StrongBuy and PABAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PABAX (2.36B). PABAX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: PABAX (3.17) vs CLBFX (1.83). CLBFX was incepted earlier than PABAX: CLBFX (23 years) vs PABAX (32 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. CLBFX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: PABAX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. PABAX (1.73). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.06 vs. PABAX (17.51).
| CLBFX | PABAX | CLBFX / PABAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.745 | 13.645 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 2.36B | 11,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 3.17 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.42 | 1.73 | 544% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.56 | 29.31 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.06 | 17.51 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.52 | 41.34 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers