Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs ETNMX
CLBFX vs ETNMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs ETNMX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$38.37
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
Eventide Balanced Fund
Price$14.99
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets388.01M
CLBFX vs ETNMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. ETNMX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and ETNMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. ETNMX (388M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than ETNMX: CLBFX (1.94) vs ETNMX (1.83). CLBFX was incepted earlier than ETNMX: CLBFX (23 years) vs ETNMX (10 years). ETNMX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX (44.00) and ETNMX (43.00) have comparable annual turnover. CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNMX: CLBFX (250) vs ETNMX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.62 vs. ETNMX (4.11). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.68 vs. ETNMX (35.86).
| CLBFX | ETNMX | CLBFX / ETNMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.02 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.614 | 6.943 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 388M | 67,526% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.62 | 4.11 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.90 | 35.75 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.68 | 35.86 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.38 | 95.11 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement