CLB
Price
$16.42
Change
+$0.69 (+4.39%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
764.57M
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSYTF
Price
$8.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
681.34M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLB vs PSYTF

Header iconCLB vs PSYTF Comparison
Open Charts CLB vs PSYTFBanner chart's image
Core Laboratories
Price$16.42
Change+$0.69 (+4.39%)
Volume$392.25K
Capitalization764.57M
Pason Systems
Price$8.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$43.08K
Capitalization681.34M
CLB vs PSYTF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLB vs. PSYTF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLB is a StrongBuy and PSYTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLB: $15.73 vs. PSYTF: $8.74)
Brand notoriety: CLB and PSYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLB: 13% vs. PSYTF: 189%
Market capitalization -- CLB: $764.57M vs. PSYTF: $681.34M
CLB [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $764.57M. PSYTF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $681.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $56.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePSYTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than CLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSYTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLB is a better buy in the short-term than PSYTF.

Price Growth

CLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.59% price change this week, while PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +3.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLB is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.17% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLB($765M) has a higher market cap than PSYTF($681M). CLB has higher P/E ratio than PSYTF: CLB (24.15) vs PSYTF (15.65). PSYTF YTD gains are higher at: -6.783 vs. CLB (-8.855). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 154M vs. CLB (69.5M). PSYTF has less debt than CLB: PSYTF (15.1M) vs CLB (167M). CLB has higher revenues than PSYTF: CLB (518M) vs PSYTF (423M).
CLBPSYTFCLB / PSYTF
Capitalization765M681M112%
EBITDA69.5M154M45%
Gain YTD-8.855-6.783131%
P/E Ratio24.1515.65154%
Revenue518M423M122%
Total CashN/A69.3M-
Total Debt167M15.1M1,106%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLB vs PSYTF: Fundamental Ratings
CLB
PSYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
6154
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8812
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLB (73) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLB (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CLB (61) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to CLB’s over the last 12 months.

CLB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as PSYTF (59) in the null industry. This means that CLB’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLB (88) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLBPSYTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSYTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLXGX23.30N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Capital Growth I
AMGIX41.02N/A
N/A
American Century Discplnd Cor Val I
MTRRX20.28N/A
N/A
MFS Total Return R2
ADVGX13.58N/A
N/A
North Square Select Small Cap I
APDDX23.61N/A
N/A
Artisan Global Discovery Advisor

CLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLB has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLB jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLB
1D Price
Change %
CLB100%
+2.21%
SLB - CLB
68%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
VAL - CLB
68%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
RES - CLB
66%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
NOV - CLB
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
WFRD - CLB
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
More

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NINE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
N/A
NINE - PSYTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
PUMP - PSYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
CLB - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
ACDC - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
XPRO - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
More