It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -4.41% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +5.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.26%.
CLB is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
HAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
CLB | HAL | CLB / HAL | |
Capitalization | 797M | 35.5B | 2% |
EBITDA | 65M | 4.94B | 1% |
Gain YTD | 13.228 | -15.175 | -87% |
P/E Ratio | 33.59 | 13.67 | 246% |
Revenue | 503M | 23B | 2% |
Total Cash | N/A | 2.26B | - |
Total Debt | 235M | 8.81B | 3% |
CLB | HAL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HAL's Valuation (37) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLB (85). This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLB (100). This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's SMR Rating (33) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLB (67). This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.
CLB's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as HAL (61). This means that CLB’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
CLB's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as HAL (85). This means that CLB’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
CLB | HAL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 3 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 3 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 3 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago0% | 4 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 8 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 3 days ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 3 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLB has been loosely correlated with RES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLB jumps, then RES could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with LBRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then LBRT could also see price increases.