CL
Price
$83.69
Change
-$0.86 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:18 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
68.15B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PG
Price
$146.35
Change
+$2.11 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
341.98B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL vs PG

Header iconCL vs PG Comparison
Open Charts CL vs PGBanner chart's image
Colgate-Palmolive
Price$83.69
Change-$0.86 (-1.02%)
Volume$3.23K
Capitalization68.15B
Procter & Gamble
Price$146.35
Change+$2.11 (+1.46%)
Volume$13.47M
Capitalization341.98B
CL vs PG Comparison Chart in %
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CL vs. PG commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and PG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CL: $84.55 vs. PG: $146.35)
Brand notoriety: CL and PG are both notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 159% vs. PG: 129%
Market capitalization -- CL: $68.15B vs. PG: $341.98B
CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $68.15B. PG’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $341.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $341.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the long-term than CL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the short-term than CL.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +9.68% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +6.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +3.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

PG is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+3.88% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($342B) has a higher market cap than CL($68.2B). CL has higher P/E ratio than PG: CL (23.68) vs PG (21.36). CL YTD gains are higher at: 6.998 vs. PG (2.121). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.8B vs. CL (4.82B). PG has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. CL (1.28B). CL has less debt than PG: CL (8.42B) vs PG (35.9B). PG has higher revenues than CL: PG (84.9B) vs CL (20.1B).
CLPGCL / PG
Capitalization68.2B342B20%
EBITDA4.82B24.8B19%
Gain YTD6.9982.121330%
P/E Ratio23.6821.36111%
Revenue20.1B84.9B24%
Total Cash1.28B11.2B11%
Total Debt8.42B35.9B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs PG: Fundamental Ratings
CL
PG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2370
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7858
SMR RATING
1..100
829
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6080
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PG's Valuation (43) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (57). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (78). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (8) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (29). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (59). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

CL's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (80). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ULST40.560.02
+0.05%
State Street® Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
SPSB30.23N/A
N/A
State Street® SPDR® S/t Corp Bd ETF
WEA11.21-0.03
-0.27%
Western Asset Premier
QRFT62.88-0.42
-0.67%
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF
EARN5.41-0.06
-1.10%
Ellington Credit Company

CL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CL
1D Price
Change %
CL100%
+1.92%
PG - CL
73%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
CHD - CL
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
KMB - CL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
UL - CL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
CLX - CL
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
More

PG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PG
1D Price
Change %
PG100%
+1.46%
CL - PG
79%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
KMB - PG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
CHD - PG
69%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
UL - PG
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
CLX - PG
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
More