Advertisement
CL vs PG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a StrongBuy and PG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.95% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
PG is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-2.09% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CL | PG | CL / PG | |
| Capitalization | 64.3B | 357B | 18% |
| EBITDA | 4.81B | 23.9B | 20% |
| Gain YTD | -10.932 | -7.282 | 150% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.36 | 23.43 | 95% |
| Revenue | 20B | 84.3B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 1.22B | 9.56B | 13% |
| Total Debt | 8.76B | 35.5B | 25% |
CL | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PG's Valuation (45) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (52). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (75). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (31). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (64). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (79). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 11 days ago 43% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 3 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 29% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| REIT | 26.62 | 0.28 | +1.06% |
| ALPS Active REIT ETF | |||
| IWR | 96.16 | 1.01 | +1.06% |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| DDWM | 41.62 | 0.35 | +0.85% |
| WisdomTree Dynamic International Eq ETF | |||
| UJAN | 42.03 | 0.13 | +0.32% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
| NFEB | 27.12 | 0.06 | +0.22% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
PG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.