CL
Price
$91.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
71 days until earnings call
NWL
Price
$9.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
85 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CL vs NWL

Header iconCL vs NWL Comparison
Open Charts CL vs NWLBanner chart's image
Colgate-Palmolive
Price$91.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.46M
CapitalizationN/A
Newell Brands
Price$9.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.15M
CapitalizationN/A
CL vs NWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CL vs. NWL commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and NWL is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CL: $91.07 vs. NWL: $9.08)
Brand notoriety: CL: Notable vs. NWL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 76% vs. NWL: 43%
Market capitalization -- CL: $74.02B vs. NWL: $3.25B
CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $74.02B. NWL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $3.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $24.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWL is a better buy in the long-term than CL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CL and NWL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.94% price change this week, while NWL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

NWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.02% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CL($74B) has a higher market cap than NWL($3.26B). CL has higher P/E ratio than NWL: CL (32.15) vs NWL (25.84). CL YTD gains are higher at: 16.771 vs. NWL (7.653). CL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.25B vs. NWL (74M). CL has more cash in the bank: 966M vs. NWL (332M). NWL has less debt than CL: NWL (5.47B) vs CL (9.06B). CL has higher revenues than NWL: CL (19.5B) vs NWL (8.13B).
CLNWLCL / NWL
Capitalization74B3.26B2,273%
EBITDA4.25B74M5,738%
Gain YTD16.7717.653219%
P/E Ratio32.1525.84124%
Revenue19.5B8.13B240%
Total Cash966M332M291%
Total Debt9.06B5.47B166%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs NWL: Fundamental Ratings
CL
NWL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17100
SMR RATING
1..100
692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9024
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWL's Valuation (26) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CL (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWL (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CL’s stock grew significantly faster than NWL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWL (92) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CL’s stock grew significantly faster than NWL’s over the last 12 months.

NWL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CL (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.

NWL's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for CL (90) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLNWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

CL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CL
1D Price
Change %
CL100%
-0.47%
PG - CL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
CHD - CL
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
KMB - CL
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
UL - CL
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
CLX - CL
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More

NWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWL has been loosely correlated with SPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWL jumps, then SPB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWL
1D Price
Change %
NWL100%
-1.09%
SPB - NWL
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
EPC - NWL
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
NUS - NWL
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.46%
CL - NWL
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
IPAR - NWL
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
More