CL
Price
$84.55
Change
+$1.59 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
68.15B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KMB
Price
$99.15
Change
+$0.42 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
32.91B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL vs KMB

Header iconCL vs KMB Comparison
Open Charts CL vs KMBBanner chart's image
Colgate-Palmolive
Price$84.55
Change+$1.59 (+1.92%)
Volume$9.95M
Capitalization68.15B
Kimberly-Clark
Price$99.15
Change+$0.42 (+0.43%)
Volume$5.55M
Capitalization32.91B
CL vs KMB Comparison Chart in %
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CL vs. KMB commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and KMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CL: $84.55 vs. KMB: $99.15)
Brand notoriety: CL: Notable vs. KMB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 159% vs. KMB: 97%
Market capitalization -- CL: $68.15B vs. KMB: $32.91B
CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $68.15B. KMB’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $32.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $341.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the long-term than CL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the short-term than CL.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +9.68% price change this week, while KMB (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +3.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

KMB is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+3.88% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CL($68.2B) has a higher market cap than KMB($32.9B). CL has higher P/E ratio than KMB: CL (23.68) vs KMB (16.78). CL YTD gains are higher at: 6.998 vs. KMB (-1.725). CL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.82B vs. KMB (3.57B). KMB has less debt than CL: KMB (7.3B) vs CL (8.42B). CL (20.1B) and KMB (19.7B) have equivalent revenues.
CLKMBCL / KMB
Capitalization68.2B32.9B207%
EBITDA4.82B3.57B135%
Gain YTD6.998-1.725-406%
P/E Ratio23.6816.78141%
Revenue20.1B19.7B102%
Total Cash1.28BN/A-
Total Debt8.42B7.3B115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs KMB: Fundamental Ratings
CL
KMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
794
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
811
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6148
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (22) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (56). This means that KMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (100). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (8) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (11). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (64). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (61). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLKMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FVD47.390.60
+1.28%
First Trust Value Line® Dividend ETF
EJUL30.090.05
+0.15%
Innovator Emerging Power Bffr ETF July
TPLE27.74N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid CAP Core Enhanced ETF
QCLN49.08-0.43
-0.87%
First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF
EMPB27.81-0.32
-1.13%
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF

CL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CL
1D Price
Change %
CL100%
+1.92%
PG - CL
72%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
CHD - CL
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
KMB - CL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
UL - CL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
CLX - CL
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
More

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
+0.43%
CL - KMB
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
PG - KMB
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
CLX - KMB
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
CHD - KMB
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
KVUE - KMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More