CKISF
Price
$6.66
Change
+$0.11 (+1.68%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.33B
CPXWF
Price
$45.32
Change
-$0.13 (-0.29%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CKISF vs CPXWF

Header iconCKISF vs CPXWF Comparison
Open Charts CKISF vs CPXWFBanner chart's image
CK Infrastructure Holdings
Price$6.66
Change+$0.11 (+1.68%)
Volume$500
Capitalization13.33B
Capital Power
Price$45.32
Change-$0.13 (-0.29%)
Volume$1.95K
Capitalization3.68B
CKISF vs CPXWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CKISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CKISF vs. CPXWF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CKISF is a Hold and CPXWF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CKISF: $6.66 vs. CPXWF: $45.49)
Brand notoriety: CKISF and CPXWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CKISF: 12% vs. CPXWF: 9%
Market capitalization -- CKISF: $13.33B vs. CPXWF: $3.68B
CKISF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $13.33B. CPXWF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $3.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CKISF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCPXWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CKISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CPXWF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the long-term than CKISF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CKISF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPXWF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CKISF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CPXWF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the short-term than CKISF.

Price Growth

CKISF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CPXWF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.21% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CKISF($13.3B) has a higher market cap than CPXWF($3.68B). CPXWF has higher P/E ratio than CKISF: CPXWF (18.45) vs CKISF (12.84). CPXWF YTD gains are higher at: 2.076 vs. CKISF (-7.465). CKISF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.98B vs. CPXWF (1.06B). CKISF has more cash in the bank: 9.59B vs. CPXWF (245M). CPXWF has less debt than CKISF: CPXWF (3.62B) vs CKISF (28.6B). CKISF has higher revenues than CPXWF: CKISF (6.84B) vs CPXWF (3.57B).
CKISFCPXWFCKISF / CPXWF
Capitalization13.3B3.68B362%
EBITDA9.98B1.06B939%
Gain YTD-7.4652.076-360%
P/E Ratio12.8418.4570%
Revenue6.84B3.57B192%
Total Cash9.59B245M3,915%
Total Debt28.6B3.62B790%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CKISF vs CPXWF: Fundamental Ratings
CKISF
CPXWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5042
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5828
SMR RATING
1..100
9855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6313
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPXWF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISF (51). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISF (58). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CKISF (98). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISF (60). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CKISF (63). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CKISFCPXWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CKISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUAG20.910.04
+0.21%
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggt Bd ETF
DFGX53.220.09
+0.18%
Dimensional Global ex US Cor Fxd Inc ETF
REW6.94N/A
N/A
ProShares UltraShort Technology
ABXB19.60N/A
N/A
Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF
CHIQ22.26-0.04
-0.18%
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF

CKISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CKISF and CLPHY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CKISF and CLPHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKISF
1D Price
Change %
CKISF100%
N/A
CLPHY - CKISF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHUEF - CKISF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
CDUAF - CKISF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CPXWF - CKISF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
AGLNF - CKISF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CPXWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPXWF has been loosely correlated with ACLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPXWF jumps, then ACLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPXWF
1D Price
Change %
CPXWF100%
+0.08%
ACLLF - CPXWF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
CDUAF - CPXWF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
EDPFY - CPXWF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
HRNNF - CPXWF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
RWEOY - CPXWF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More