CKHGY
Price
$97.52
Change
+$1.78 (+1.86%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
11.75B
CNAF
Price
$6.65
Change
+$0.05 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
35.76M
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CKHGY vs CNAF

Header iconCKHGY vs CNAF Comparison
Open Charts CKHGY vs CNAFBanner chart's image
Capitec Bank Holdings
Price$97.52
Change+$1.78 (+1.86%)
Volume$1.67K
Capitalization11.75B
Commercial National Financial Corp. (PA)
Price$6.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.76%)
Volume$2.09K
Capitalization35.76M
CKHGY vs CNAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CKHGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CKHGY vs. CNAF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CKHGY is a Hold and CNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CKHGY: $97.52 vs. CNAF: $6.65)
Brand notoriety: CKHGY and CNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CKHGY: 76% vs. CNAF: 42%
Market capitalization -- CKHGY: $11.75B vs. CNAF: $35.76M
CKHGY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.75B. CNAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $35.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CKHGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CKHGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CKHGY is a better buy in the long-term than CNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CKHGY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CKHGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CKHGY and CNAF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CKHGY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while CNAF (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNAF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CKHGY($11.8B) has a higher market cap than CNAF($35.8M). CKHGY has higher P/E ratio than CNAF: CKHGY (20.12) vs CNAF (9.21). CKHGY YTD gains are higher at: 18.450 vs. CNAF (1.637). CKHGY has higher revenues than CNAF: CKHGY (30.3B) vs CNAF (15.6M).
CKHGYCNAFCKHGY / CNAF
Capitalization11.8B35.8M32,961%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.4501.6371,127%
P/E Ratio20.129.21219%
Revenue30.3B15.6M194,231%
Total CashN/A4.69M-
Total DebtN/A20.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CKHGY vs CNAF: Fundamental Ratings
CKHGY
CNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
505
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
377
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4849
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNAF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CKHGY (99). This means that CNAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CKHGY’s over the last 12 months.

CKHGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNAF (100). This means that CKHGY’s stock grew significantly faster than CNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CKHGY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNAF (77). This means that CKHGY’s stock grew significantly faster than CNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CKHGY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CNAF (59). This means that CKHGY’s stock grew similarly to CNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CKHGY's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CNAF (49). This means that CKHGY’s stock grew similarly to CNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CKHGYCNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CKHGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEON22.832.22
+10.77%
Neonode
OCCIO24.850.15
+0.61%
OFS Credit Company
EGP167.70-0.21
-0.13%
EastGroup Properties
GRND22.19-0.21
-0.94%
Grindr
CCEL5.19-0.24
-4.42%
Cryo-Cell International

CKHGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CKHGY has been loosely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CKHGY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKHGY
1D Price
Change %
CKHGY100%
+1.86%
NDBKY - CKHGY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
DNBBY - CKHGY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
BPXXY - CKHGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGRPY - CKHGY
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.64%
LYG - CKHGY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More

CNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNAF and DSBX have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNAF and DSBX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNAF
1D Price
Change %
CNAF100%
N/A
DSBX - CNAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKHGY - CNAF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
CIHKY - CNAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
CMAKY - CNAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMHF - CNAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More