CJPRY
Price
$10.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
80 days until earnings call
UNP
Price
$235.58
Change
-$4.83 (-2.01%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CJPRY vs UNP

Header iconCJPRY vs UNP Comparison
Open Charts CJPRY vs UNPBanner chart's image
Central Japan Railway
Price$10.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$335.11K
CapitalizationN/A
Union Pacific
Price$235.58
Change-$4.83 (-2.01%)
Volume$2.77M
CapitalizationN/A
CJPRY vs UNP Comparison Chart
Loading...
UNP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CJPRY vs. UNP commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CJPRY is a Sell and UNP is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CJPRY: $10.14 vs. UNP: $240.41)
Brand notoriety: CJPRY: Not notable vs. UNP: Notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CJPRY: 202% vs. UNP: 103%
Market capitalization -- CJPRY: $20.13B vs. UNP: $142.82B
CJPRY [@Railroads] is valued at $20.13B. UNP’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $142.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $16.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CJPRY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUNP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CJPRY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UNP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNP is a better buy in the long-term than CJPRY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UNP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UNP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CJPRY (@Railroads) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while UNP (@Railroads) price change was -3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was -1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CJPRY is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.

UNP is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (-1.96% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNP($143B) has a higher market cap than CJPRY($20.1B). UNP has higher P/E ratio than CJPRY: UNP (21.65) vs CJPRY (7.28). UNP YTD gains are higher at: -0.529 vs. CJPRY (-19.628).
CJPRYUNPCJPRY / UNP
Capitalization20.1B143B14%
EBITDAN/A12.4B-
Gain YTD-19.628-0.5293,712%
P/E Ratio7.2821.6534%
RevenueN/A24.3B-
Total CashN/A967M-
Total DebtN/A32.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CJPRY vs UNP: Fundamental Ratings
CJPRY
UNP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5874
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10032
SMR RATING
1..100
8022
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8859
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNP's Valuation (77) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as CJPRY (87) in the null industry. This means that UNP’s stock grew similarly to CJPRY’s over the last 12 months.

UNP's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Railroads industry is significantly better than the same rating for CJPRY (100) in the null industry. This means that UNP’s stock grew significantly faster than CJPRY’s over the last 12 months.

UNP's SMR Rating (22) in the Railroads industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CJPRY (80) in the null industry. This means that UNP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CJPRY’s over the last 12 months.

UNP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as CJPRY (75) in the null industry. This means that UNP’s stock grew similarly to CJPRY’s over the last 12 months.

UNP's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as CJPRY (88) in the null industry. This means that UNP’s stock grew similarly to CJPRY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UNP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
UNP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

CJPRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CJPRY has been closely correlated with EJPRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CJPRY jumps, then EJPRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CJPRY
1D Price
Change %
CJPRY100%
-0.59%
EJPRY - CJPRY
68%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
WJRYY - CJPRY
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
WAB - CJPRY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
WJRYF - CJPRY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNP - CJPRY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More

UNP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNP has been closely correlated with CSX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UNP jumps, then CSX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNP
1D Price
Change %
UNP100%
+0.63%
CSX - UNP
71%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
NSC - UNP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
WAB - UNP
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
TRN - UNP
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
FSTR - UNP
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More