CJIMF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.05 (-13.16%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
20.61M
USHAF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CJIMF vs USHAF

Header iconCJIMF vs USHAF Comparison
Open Charts CJIMF vs USHAFBanner chart's image
Gunpoint Exploration
Price$0.33
Change-$0.05 (-13.16%)
Volume$200
Capitalization20.61M
USHA RES
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.31K
Capitalization6.07M
CJIMF vs USHAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CJIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CJIMF vs. USHAF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CJIMF is a Hold and USHAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CJIMF: $0.33 vs. USHAF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: CJIMF and USHAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CJIMF: 14% vs. USHAF: 53%
Market capitalization -- CJIMF: $20.61M vs. USHAF: $6.07M
CJIMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $20.61M. USHAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CJIMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSHAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CJIMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USHAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USHAF is a better buy in the long-term than CJIMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CJIMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USHAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CJIMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • USHAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CJIMF is a better buy in the short-term than USHAF.

Price Growth

CJIMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while USHAF (@Precious Metals) price change was -31.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CJIMF($20.6M) has a higher market cap than USHAF($6.07M). CJIMF YTD gains are higher at: -23.701 vs. USHAF (-39.718). CJIMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -694.7K vs. USHAF (-2.34M). CJIMF has more cash in the bank: 1.46M vs. USHAF (1.02M). CJIMF (0) and USHAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CJIMFUSHAFCJIMF / USHAF
Capitalization20.6M6.07M339%
EBITDA-694.7K-2.34M30%
Gain YTD-23.701-39.71860%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.46M1.02M143%
Total Debt700KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CJIMF: Fundamental Ratings
CJIMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CJIMFUSHAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CJIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCGPF2.65N/A
N/A
Oceana Group Ltd.
SNROF46.26N/A
N/A
Sanrio Co. Ltd.
UPMKF27.83N/A
N/A
UPM-Kymmene Corp.
PVCT0.07N/A
-1.64%
Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
RMTG0.03-0.01
-29.55%
Regenerative Medical Technology Group Inc.

CJIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CJIMF has been loosely correlated with BDLNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CJIMF jumps, then BDLNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CJIMF
1D Price
Change %
CJIMF100%
N/A
BDLNF - CJIMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
USHAF - CJIMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-10.46%
MEXGF - CJIMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-23.90%
ADYRF - CJIMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFTN - CJIMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+38.54%
More

USHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USHAF and CJIMF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USHAF and CJIMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USHAF
1D Price
Change %
USHAF100%
-10.46%
CJIMF - USHAF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KOOYF - USHAF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
MEXGF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-23.90%
TRX - USHAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
SILS - USHAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More