CJEWY
Price
$18.55
Change
+$1.30 (+7.54%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.26B
LKFLF
Price
$3.27
Change
+$0.01 (+0.31%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CJEWY vs LKFLF

Header iconCJEWY vs LKFLF Comparison
Open Charts CJEWY vs LKFLFBanner chart's image
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
Price$18.55
Change+$1.30 (+7.54%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization20.26B
Luk Fook Holdings International
Price$3.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.31%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.95B
CJEWY vs LKFLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CJEWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CJEWY vs. LKFLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CJEWY is a Buy and LKFLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CJEWY: $18.55 vs. LKFLF: $3.28)
Brand notoriety: CJEWY and LKFLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CJEWY: 179% vs. LKFLF: 16%
Market capitalization -- CJEWY: $20.26B vs. LKFLF: $1.95B
CJEWY [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $20.26B. LKFLF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $1.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $289.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $38.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CJEWY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLKFLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CJEWY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LKFLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CJEWY is a better buy in the long-term than LKFLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CJEWY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKFLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CJEWY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LKFLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CJEWY is a better buy in the short-term than LKFLF.

Price Growth

CJEWY (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LKFLF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+1.77% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CJEWY($20.3B) has a higher market cap than LKFLF($1.95B). CJEWY has higher P/E ratio than LKFLF: CJEWY (24.44) vs LKFLF (13.66). CJEWY YTD gains are higher at: 115.911 vs. LKFLF (94.940).
CJEWYLKFLFCJEWY / LKFLF
Capitalization20.3B1.95B1,040%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD115.91194.940122%
P/E Ratio24.4413.66179%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CJEWY vs LKFLF: Fundamental Ratings
CJEWY
LKFLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3734
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4360
SMR RATING
1..100
9773
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKFLF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as CJEWY (14). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to CJEWY’s over the last 12 months.

CJEWY's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LKFLF (60). This means that CJEWY’s stock grew similarly to LKFLF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as CJEWY (97). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to CJEWY’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CJEWY (37). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to CJEWY’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CJEWY (7). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to CJEWY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CJEWYLKFLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CJEWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASND205.917.78
+3.93%
Ascendis Pharma A/S
AI15.620.16
+1.03%
C3ai
BAND15.680.03
+0.19%
Bandwidth
JZ1.54N/A
N/A
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited
ABVE1.65-0.19
-10.33%
Above Food Ingredients Inc

CJEWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CJEWY and CEBTF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CJEWY and CEBTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CJEWY
1D Price
Change %
CJEWY100%
N/A
CEBTF - CJEWY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - CJEWY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCUCY - CJEWY
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
CHDRF - CJEWY
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
BURBY - CJEWY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
More

LKFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKFLF and CHDRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKFLF and CHDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFLF
1D Price
Change %
LKFLF100%
N/A
CHDRF - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
BCUCY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
CJEWY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWGAY - LKFLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.24%
SWGNF - LKFLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More