CJEWF
Price
$1.90
Change
+$0.20 (+11.76%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
19.69B
DCOHF
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.01 (-1.56%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
252.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CJEWF vs DCOHF

Header iconCJEWF vs DCOHF Comparison
Open Charts CJEWF vs DCOHFBanner chart's image
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
Price$1.90
Change+$0.20 (+11.76%)
Volume$625
Capitalization19.69B
Dickson Concepts International
Price$0.63
Change-$0.01 (-1.56%)
Volume$605
Capitalization252.01M
CJEWF vs DCOHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CJEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CJEWF vs. DCOHF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CJEWF is a Hold and DCOHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CJEWF: $1.90 vs. DCOHF: $0.63)
Brand notoriety: CJEWF and DCOHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CJEWF: 17% vs. DCOHF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CJEWF: $19.69B vs. DCOHF: $252.01M
CJEWF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $19.69B. DCOHF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $252.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $301.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $39.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CJEWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDCOHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CJEWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DCOHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CJEWF is a better buy in the long-term than DCOHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CJEWF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DCOHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CJEWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • DCOHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CJEWF is a better buy in the short-term than DCOHF.

Price Growth

CJEWF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +11.76% price change this week, while DCOHF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+2.43% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CJEWF($19.7B) has a higher market cap than DCOHF($252M). CJEWF has higher P/E ratio than DCOHF: CJEWF (25.03) vs DCOHF (9.79). CJEWF YTD gains are higher at: 109.482 vs. DCOHF (-1.664). CJEWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.95B vs. DCOHF (326M). DCOHF (3.95B) and CJEWF (3.84B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . DCOHF has less debt than CJEWF: DCOHF (1.01B) vs CJEWF (29.6B). CJEWF has higher revenues than DCOHF: CJEWF (98.6B) vs DCOHF (2.09B).
CJEWFDCOHFCJEWF / DCOHF
Capitalization19.7B252M7,817%
EBITDA8.95B326M2,744%
Gain YTD109.482-1.664-6,581%
P/E Ratio25.039.79256%
Revenue98.6B2.09B4,718%
Total Cash3.84B3.95B97%
Total Debt29.6B1.01B2,934%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CJEWF vs DCOHF: Fundamental Ratings
CJEWF
DCOHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6270
SMR RATING
1..100
9763
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
710
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DCOHF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CJEWF (13). This means that DCOHF’s stock grew similarly to CJEWF’s over the last 12 months.

CJEWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as DCOHF (70). This means that CJEWF’s stock grew similarly to DCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

DCOHF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CJEWF (97). This means that DCOHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CJEWF’s over the last 12 months.

CJEWF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as DCOHF (54). This means that CJEWF’s stock grew similarly to DCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

CJEWF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as DCOHF (10). This means that CJEWF’s stock grew similarly to DCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CJEWFDCOHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CJEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMCQX13.800.07
+0.51%
GMO US Equity VI
MITCX34.150.16
+0.47%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr C
BRGNX41.070.18
+0.44%
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Idx Instl
PLJMX59.070.20
+0.34%
Putnam Research R6
HUDEX25.36-0.01
-0.04%
Huber Large Cap Value Inst

CJEWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CJEWF and CHDRY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CJEWF and CHDRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CJEWF
1D Price
Change %
CJEWF100%
N/A
CHDRY - CJEWF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
CFRHF - CJEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
BCUCY - CJEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
CJEWY - CJEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCOHF - CJEWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DCOHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCOHF and CFRHF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCOHF and CFRHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCOHF
1D Price
Change %
DCOHF100%
N/A
CFRHF - DCOHF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
CFRUY - DCOHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
CHDRF - DCOHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEBTF - DCOHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJEWF - DCOHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More