CIXXF
Price
$23.24
Change
+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.32B
31 days until earnings call
STT
Price
$110.31
Change
+$0.82 (+0.75%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
23.35B
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIXXF vs STT

Header iconCIXXF vs STT Comparison
Open Charts CIXXF vs STTBanner chart's image
CI Financial
Price$23.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Volume$354
Capitalization2.32B
State Street
Price$110.31
Change+$0.82 (+0.75%)
Volume$1.17M
Capitalization23.35B
CIXXF vs STT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIXXF vs. STT commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIXXF is a Hold and STT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CIXXF: $23.24 vs. STT: $109.49)
Brand notoriety: CIXXF and STT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIXXF: 0% vs. STT: 4%
Market capitalization -- CIXXF: $2.32B vs. STT: $23.35B
CIXXF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.32B. STT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $23.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIXXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CIXXF and STT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIXXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIXXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the short-term than CIXXF.

Price Growth

CIXXF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.04% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIXXF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

STT is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.43% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STT($23.3B) has a higher market cap than CIXXF($2.32B). CIXXF has higher P/E ratio than STT: CIXXF (15.72) vs STT (13.84). STT YTD gains are higher at: 14.203 vs. CIXXF (7.942). STT has more cash in the bank: 4.05B vs. CIXXF (174M). CIXXF has less debt than STT: CIXXF (4.36B) vs STT (21.5B). STT has higher revenues than CIXXF: STT (11.9B) vs CIXXF (2.44B).
CIXXFSTTCIXXF / STT
Capitalization2.32B23.3B10%
EBITDA673MN/A-
Gain YTD7.94214.20356%
P/E Ratio15.7213.84114%
Revenue2.44B11.9B20%
Total Cash174M4.05B4%
Total Debt4.36B21.5B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIXXF vs STT: Fundamental Ratings
CIXXF
STT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5049
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4732
SMR RATING
1..100
978
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
167
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STT's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIXXF (40) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIXXF (47) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

STT's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIXXF (97) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew significantly faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIXXF (43) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIXXF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STT (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CIXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than STT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIXXFSTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMDCX3.370.04
+1.20%
Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth C
SEEGX85.010.90
+1.07%
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth I
FRVFX46.500.40
+0.87%
Franklin Small Cap Value C
AMALX10.290.04
+0.39%
American Century Small Cap Dividend G
EIVPX16.060.04
+0.25%
Parametric Volatil Risk Prm-Defensv I

CIXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIXXF and IGIFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIXXF and IGIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIXXF
1D Price
Change %
CIXXF100%
N/A
IGIFF - CIXXF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
ONEXF - CIXXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
STT - CIXXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGOPY - CIXXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
BAM - CIXXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
More

STT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STT
1D Price
Change %
STT100%
N/A
NTRS - STT
80%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
BN - STT
78%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
BLK - STT
77%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
CG - STT
76%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
PFG - STT
76%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More