CIXPF
Price
$10.10
Change
+$0.05 (+0.50%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
70.35B
WF
Price
$52.91
Change
-$0.32 (-0.60%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.79B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIXPF vs WF

Header iconCIXPF vs WF Comparison
Open Charts CIXPF vs WFBanner chart's image
Caixabank SA
Price$10.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.50%)
Volume$342
Capitalization70.35B
Woori Financial Group
Price$52.91
Change-$0.32 (-0.60%)
Volume$59.36K
Capitalization12.79B
CIXPF vs WF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIXPF vs. WF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIXPF is a Hold and WF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CIXPF: $10.10 vs. WF: $52.91)
Brand notoriety: CIXPF and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIXPF: 18% vs. WF: 91%
Market capitalization -- CIXPF: $70.35B vs. WF: $12.79B
CIXPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $70.35B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $12.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIXPF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIXPF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIXPF is a better buy in the long-term than WF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIXPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIXPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIXPF is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

CIXPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIXPF($70.3B) has a higher market cap than WF($12.8B). CIXPF has higher P/E ratio than WF: CIXPF (10.71) vs WF (6.64). CIXPF YTD gains are higher at: 92.381 vs. WF (72.648).
CIXPFWFCIXPF / WF
Capitalization70.3B12.8B549%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD92.38172.648127%
P/E Ratio10.716.64161%
Revenue16.9BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt51.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIXPF vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
CIXPF
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1919
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIXPF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WF (61) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CIXPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CIXPF (2) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to CIXPF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CIXPF (5) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to CIXPF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CIXPF (42) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to CIXPF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CIXPF (19) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to CIXPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIXPFWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SWIM8.240.24
+3.00%
Latham Group
WTF4.450.12
+2.77%
Waton Financial Limited
YYAI1.620.03
+1.89%
Connexa Sports Technologies
CPNG28.910.18
+0.63%
Coupang
FTDR63.05-0.24
-0.38%
Frontdoor

CIXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIXPF and WF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIXPF and WF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIXPF
1D Price
Change %
CIXPF100%
N/A
WF - CIXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
CBAN - CIXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
BKHPF - CIXPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFBC - CIXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
WAFD - CIXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-0.60%
SHG - WF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
KB - WF
73%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
BSAC - WF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
BCH - WF
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
DB - WF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
More