CIXPF
Price
$11.41
Change
+$0.93 (+8.87%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Capitalization
83.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFBC
Price
$99.98
Change
+$2.15 (+2.20%)
Updated
Dec 12, 01:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.19B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIXPF vs PFBC

Header iconCIXPF vs PFBC Comparison
Open Charts CIXPF vs PFBCBanner chart's image
Caixabank SA
Price$11.41
Change+$0.93 (+8.87%)
Volume$434K
Capitalization83.45B
Preferred Bank
Price$99.98
Change+$2.15 (+2.20%)
Volume$121
Capitalization1.19B
CIXPF vs PFBC Comparison Chart in %
CIXPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIXPF vs. PFBC commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIXPF is a Buy and PFBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CIXPF: $11.41 vs. PFBC: $97.83)
Brand notoriety: CIXPF and PFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIXPF: 1292% vs. PFBC: 121%
Market capitalization -- CIXPF: $83.45B vs. PFBC: $1.19B
CIXPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $83.45B. PFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIXPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIXPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIXPF is a better buy in the long-term than PFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIXPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIXPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIXPF is a better buy in the short-term than PFBC.

Price Growth

CIXPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.93% price change this week, while PFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIXPF($83.4B) has a higher market cap than PFBC($1.19B). CIXPF has higher P/E ratio than PFBC: CIXPF (12.24) vs PFBC (9.90). CIXPF YTD gains are higher at: 117.333 vs. PFBC (17.312). PFBC has less debt than CIXPF: PFBC (372M) vs CIXPF (51.2B). CIXPF has higher revenues than PFBC: CIXPF (16.9B) vs PFBC (280M).
CIXPFPFBCCIXPF / PFBC
Capitalization83.4B1.19B6,991%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD117.33317.312678%
P/E Ratio12.249.90124%
Revenue16.9B280M6,036%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt51.2B372M13,763%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIXPF vs PFBC: Fundamental Ratings
CIXPF
PFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4177
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
221
SMR RATING
1..100
520
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIXPF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (21) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (20) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIXPFPFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIXPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AI15.920.10
+0.63%
C3ai
BSY41.110.20
+0.49%
Bentley Systems
AAM10.61-0.03
-0.28%
AA Mission Acquisition Corp
ATYR0.77-0.05
-6.21%
aTyr Pharma Inc
CETX3.48-0.64
-15.53%
Cemtrex Inc

CIXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIXPF and OVCHF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIXPF and OVCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIXPF
1D Price
Change %
CIXPF100%
N/A
OVCHF - CIXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTDF - CIXPF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMAKY - CIXPF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNAF - CIXPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
CNBB - CIXPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
More

PFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFBC has been closely correlated with STEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFBC jumps, then STEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFBC
1D Price
Change %
PFBC100%
+0.77%
STEL - PFBC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
NWBI - PFBC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
WSFS - PFBC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
HFWA - PFBC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
PEBO - PFBC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
More