CIXPF
Price
$10.22
Change
+$0.19 (+1.89%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
72.67B
CMUV
Price
$24.21
Change
+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
42.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIXPF vs CMUV

Header iconCIXPF vs CMUV Comparison
Open Charts CIXPF vs CMUVBanner chart's image
Caixabank SA
Price$10.22
Change+$0.19 (+1.89%)
Volume$973
Capitalization72.67B
CMUV Ban
Price$24.21
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization42.29M
CIXPF vs CMUV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIXPF vs. CMUV commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIXPF is a StrongBuy and CMUV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CIXPF: $10.23 vs. CMUV: $24.21)
Brand notoriety: CIXPF and CMUV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIXPF: 48% vs. CMUV: 6%
Market capitalization -- CIXPF: $72.67B vs. CMUV: $42.29M
CIXPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $72.67B. CMUV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $42.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIXPF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileCMUV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIXPF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • CMUV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIXPF is a better buy in the long-term than CMUV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIXPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMUV’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIXPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMUV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIXPF is a better buy in the short-term than CMUV.

Price Growth

CIXPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.82% price change this week, while CMUV (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIXPF($72.7B) has a higher market cap than CMUV($42.3M). CMUV has higher P/E ratio than CIXPF: CMUV (11.64) vs CIXPF (10.79). CIXPF YTD gains are higher at: 94.762 vs. CMUV (18.787). CMUV has less debt than CIXPF: CMUV (8.74M) vs CIXPF (51.2B).
CIXPFCMUVCIXPF / CMUV
Capitalization72.7B42.3M171,868%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD94.76218.787504%
P/E Ratio10.7911.6493%
Revenue16.9BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt51.2B8.74M586,081%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIXPF vs CMUV: Fundamental Ratings
CIXPF
CMUV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4935
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIXPF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (48). This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (3). This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMUV (54). This means that CIXPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (47). This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (28). This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIXPFCMUV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
47%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUJIY12.160.15
+1.25%
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp.
BPMUF67.75N/A
N/A
Basilea Pharmaceutica AG
NUVR12.25N/A
N/A
Nuvera Communications, Inc.
OJIPY52.34N/A
N/A
Oji Holdings Corp
MVMDF0.01N/A
-22.01%
Mountain Valley MD Holdings Inc.

CIXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIXPF and WF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIXPF and WF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIXPF
1D Price
Change %
CIXPF100%
N/A
WF - CIXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
CBAN - CIXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
BKHPF - CIXPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFBC - CIXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
WAFD - CIXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
More

CMUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMUV and SVBT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMUV and SVBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMUV
1D Price
Change %
CMUV100%
+0.08%
SVBT - CMUV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMHF - CMUV
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIWV - CMUV
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - CMUV
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIXPF - CMUV
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More