CIXPF
Price
$8.48
Change
-$0.20 (-2.30%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.21B
CMAKY
Price
$5.13
Change
-$0.65 (-11.25%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
23.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIXPF vs CMAKY

Header iconCIXPF vs CMAKY Comparison
Open Charts CIXPF vs CMAKYBanner chart's image
Caixabank SA
Price$8.48
Change-$0.20 (-2.30%)
Volume$975
Capitalization30.21B
China Minsheng Banking
Price$5.13
Change-$0.65 (-11.25%)
Volume$416
Capitalization23.21B
CIXPF vs CMAKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIXPF vs. CMAKY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIXPF is a Hold and CMAKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CIXPF: $8.48 vs. CMAKY: $5.13)
Brand notoriety: CIXPF and CMAKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIXPF: 52% vs. CMAKY: 35%
Market capitalization -- CIXPF: $30.21B vs. CMAKY: $23.21B
CIXPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $30.21B. CMAKY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIXPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMAKY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIXPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMAKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CIXPF and CMAKY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIXPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMAKY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIXPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMAKY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIXPF is a better buy in the short-term than CMAKY.

Price Growth

CIXPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.25% price change this week, while CMAKY (@Regional Banks) price change was -14.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIXPF($30.2B) has a higher market cap than CMAKY($23.2B). CIXPF has higher P/E ratio than CMAKY: CIXPF (8.60) vs CMAKY (3.71). CIXPF YTD gains are higher at: 61.524 vs. CMAKY (32.902). CIXPF has less debt than CMAKY: CIXPF (53B) vs CMAKY (668B). CMAKY has higher revenues than CIXPF: CMAKY (143B) vs CIXPF (14.6B).
CIXPFCMAKYCIXPF / CMAKY
Capitalization30.2B23.2B130%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD61.52432.902187%
P/E Ratio8.603.71232%
Revenue14.6B143B10%
Total Cash605MN/A-
Total Debt53B668B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIXPF vs CMAKY: Fundamental Ratings
CIXPF
CMAKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
290
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMAKY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIXPF (71). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIXPF’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMAKY (90). This means that CIXPF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CIXPF (4). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to CIXPF’s over the last 12 months.

CIXPF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CMAKY (44). This means that CIXPF’s stock grew similarly to CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CIXPF (41). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to CIXPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIXPFCMAKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNF186.320.36
+0.19%
Unifirst Corp
ON52.93-0.81
-1.51%
ON Semiconductor Corp
UBX0.77-0.01
-1.73%
Unity Biotechnology
VIR5.17-0.14
-2.64%
Vir Biotechnology
OPAL2.52-0.09
-3.45%
OPAL Fuels

CIXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIXPF and WF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIXPF and WF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIXPF
1D Price
Change %
CIXPF100%
N/A
WF - CIXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
CBAN - CIXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
BKHPF - CIXPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFBC - CIXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
WAFD - CIXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
More

CMAKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMAKY and KFFB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMAKY and KFFB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMAKY
1D Price
Change %
CMAKY100%
N/A
KFFB - CMAKY
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
PONT - CMAKY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FVCB - CMAKY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
CMHF - CMAKY
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
CIXPF - CMAKY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More