CISS
Price
$3.61
Change
+$0.01 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jun 17, 12:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.81M
NMM
Price
$40.29
Change
-$1.10 (-2.66%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CISS vs NMM

Header iconCISS vs NMM Comparison
Open Charts CISS vs NMMBanner chart's image
C3is
Price$3.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.28%)
Volume$240
Capitalization2.81M
Navios Maritime Partners
Price$40.29
Change-$1.10 (-2.66%)
Volume$117.64K
Capitalization1.19B
CISS vs NMM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CISS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CISS vs. NMM commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISS is a Hold and NMM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CISS: $3.60 vs. NMM: $40.29)
Brand notoriety: CISS and NMM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CISS: 770% vs. NMM: 124%
Market capitalization -- CISS: $2.81M vs. NMM: $1.19B
CISS [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $2.81M. NMM’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CISS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CISS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMM is a better buy in the long-term than CISS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CISS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CISS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CISS is a better buy in the short-term than NMM.

Price Growth

CISS (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.05% price change this week, while NMM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.96% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMM($1.19B) has a higher market cap than CISS($2.81M). NMM has higher P/E ratio than CISS: NMM (3.67) vs CISS (0.01). NMM YTD gains are higher at: -6.695 vs. CISS (-57.954). NMM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 699M vs. CISS (9.85M). NMM has more cash in the bank: 342M vs. CISS (15.7M). CISS has less debt than NMM: CISS (12.9K) vs NMM (1.32B). NMM has higher revenues than CISS: NMM (1.32B) vs CISS (36.5M).
CISSNMMCISS / NMM
Capitalization2.81M1.19B0%
EBITDA9.85M699M1%
Gain YTD-57.954-6.695866%
P/E Ratio0.013.670%
Revenue36.5M1.32B3%
Total Cash15.7M342M5%
Total Debt12.9K1.32B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMM: Fundamental Ratings
NMM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CISSNMM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CISS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VWUSX74.430.98
+1.33%
Vanguard US Growth Investor
MLVBX19.080.07
+0.37%
MFS Low Volatility Equity B
MFLDX24.09N/A
N/A
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
FBMCX12.30N/A
N/A
Franklin Managed Income C
MCEGX14.28N/A
N/A
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Inv C

CISS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CISS and NMM have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CISS and NMM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CISS
1D Price
Change %
CISS100%
-14.89%
NMM - CISS
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
CTRM - CISS
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.82%
USEA - CISS
13%
Poorly correlated
-8.67%
TORO - CISS
9%
Poorly correlated
-10.16%
HSHP - CISS
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

NMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMM has been loosely correlated with DAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMM jumps, then DAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMM
1D Price
Change %
NMM100%
-2.66%
DAC - NMM
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.37%
CMRE - NMM
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
SBLK - NMM
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
ECO - NMM
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.35%
GNK - NMM
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
More