CISS
Price
$2.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.32M
HAFN
Price
$6.23
Change
+$0.04 (+0.65%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.09B
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CISS vs HAFN

Header iconCISS vs HAFN Comparison
Open Charts CISS vs HAFNBanner chart's image
C3is
Price$2.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$23.08K
Capitalization2.32M
Hafnia
Price$6.23
Change+$0.04 (+0.65%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization3.09B
CISS vs HAFN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CISS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CISS vs. HAFN commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISS is a Buy and HAFN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CISS: $2.15 vs. HAFN: $6.23)
Brand notoriety: CISS and HAFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CISS: 6% vs. HAFN: 86%
Market capitalization -- CISS: $2.32M vs. HAFN: $3.09B
CISS [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $2.32M. HAFN’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $3.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CISS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CISS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFN is a better buy in the long-term than CISS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CISS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CISS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CISS is a better buy in the short-term than HAFN.

Price Growth

CISS (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -6.11% price change this week, while HAFN (@Marine Shipping) price change was +2.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAFN is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.03% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAFN($3.09B) has a higher market cap than CISS($2.32M). HAFN has higher P/E ratio than CISS: HAFN (7.42) vs CISS (0.10). HAFN YTD gains are higher at: 17.065 vs. CISS (-74.889). HAFN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 696M vs. CISS (15.5M). HAFN has more cash in the bank: 194M vs. CISS (2.28M). CISS has less debt than HAFN: CISS (58.5K) vs HAFN (1.03B). HAFN has higher revenues than CISS: HAFN (2.36B) vs CISS (36.4M).
CISSHAFNCISS / HAFN
Capitalization2.32M3.09B0%
EBITDA15.5M696M2%
Gain YTD-74.88917.065-439%
P/E Ratio0.107.421%
Revenue36.4M2.36B2%
Total Cash2.28M194M1%
Total Debt58.5K1.03B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CISSHAFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CISS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYM36.670.16
+0.44%
RYTHM Inc
TACHU10.27-0.05
-0.48%
Titan Acquisition Corp
MAMA10.62-0.19
-1.76%
Mama's Creations
PBI11.28-0.25
-2.17%
Pitney Bowes
YPF26.05-0.72
-2.69%
YPF Sociedad Anonima

CISS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CISS and NMM have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CISS and NMM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CISS
1D Price
Change %
CISS100%
N/A
NMM - CISS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
CTRM - CISS
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
USEA - CISS
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
TORO - CISS
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
HAFN - CISS
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More

HAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFN has been closely correlated with ECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFN jumps, then ECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFN
1D Price
Change %
HAFN100%
+0.65%
ECO - HAFN
73%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
NAT - HAFN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
ASC - HAFN
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
BWLP - HAFN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
SFL - HAFN
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More