Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CISMX vs MVCAX
CISMX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts CISMX vs MVCAX
Clarkston Partners Institutional
Price$13.48
Change-$0.09 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets950.1M
CISMX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CISMX vs. MVCAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISMX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. CISMX (950M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than CISMX: MVCAX (0.86) vs CISMX (0.51). CISMX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: CISMX (10 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). CISMX (1.03) and MVCAX (1.00) have similar cost to investors . MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CISMX (22.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CISMX: MVCAX (1000) vs CISMX (25000). CISMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.21 vs. MVCAX (-3.52). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.65 vs. CISMX (5.82).
| CISMX | MVCAX | CISMX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.00 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.324 | 3.325 | -190% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 950M | 17.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.86 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.21 | -3.52 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.98 | 6.81 | -293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.82 | 47.65 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement