Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CISMX vs FLPSX
CISMX vs FLPSX Comparison
Open Charts CISMX vs FLPSX
Clarkston Partners Institutional
Price$13.21
Change+$0.17 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets893.04M
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.68
Change+$0.33 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
CISMX vs FLPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CISMX vs. FLPSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISMX is a Hold and FLPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. CISMX (893M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than CISMX: FLPSX (1.66) vs CISMX (0.48). CISMX was incepted earlier than FLPSX: CISMX (10 years) vs FLPSX (36 years). CISMX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FLPSX (0.89). FLPSX (23.00) and CISMX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CISMX: FLPSX (0) vs CISMX (25000). FLPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.15 vs. CISMX (-7.66). CISMX return over 5 years is better than : 10.11 vs. FLPSX (7.56).
| CISMX | FLPSX | CISMX / FLPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.89 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.89 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.200 | 3.750 | -219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 893M | 24B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.66 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.66 | -4.15 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.07 | 7.03 | -115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.11 | 7.56 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.41 | -1.65 | -2,689% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement