Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CISGX vs RGACX
CISGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CISGX vs RGACX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Gr Instl
Price$21.51
Change+$0.23 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CISGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CISGX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CISGX (2.53B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CISGX: RGACX (0.07) vs CISGX (0.00). CISGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CISGX (5 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CISGX (0.84). CISGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CISGX: RGACX (250) vs CISGX (500000). CISGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.43 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. CISGX (16.50).
| CISGX | RGACX | CISGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.866 | 15.516 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.43 | 17.83 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.94 | 58.53 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.50 | 40.02 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.22 | 95.93 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement