Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIPNX vs NRGSX
CIPNX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIPNX vs NRGSX
Champlain Small Company Institutional
Price$21.43
Change+$0.11 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.83
Change+$0.89 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.56B
CIPNX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIPNX vs. NRGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIPNX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.56B vs. CIPNX (1.56B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CIPNX: NRGSX (0.07) vs CIPNX (0.00). CIPNX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CIPNX (9 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CIPNX (0.99) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CIPNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIPNX: NRGSX (0) vs CIPNX (1000000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.38 vs. CIPNX (-16.52). CIPNX return over 5 years is better than : -6.86 vs. NRGSX (-7.82).
| CIPNX | NRGSX | CIPNX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.74 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.74 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.116 | -3.565 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 8.56B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.52 | -14.38 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.96 | -2.58 | -76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.86 | -7.82 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers