Advertisement
CIOXY vs COGZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOXY is a Hold and COGZF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIOXY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCOGZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CIOXY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- COGZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COGZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- COGZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CIOXY (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while COGZF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -0.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.09%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.23%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.92% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Services to the Health Industry (+2.05% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| CIOXY | COGZF | CIOXY / COGZF | |
| Capitalization | 2.82B | 186M | 1,515% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 76.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 8.12 | 25.94 | 31% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
CIOXY | COGZF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CIOXY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COGZF (66). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than COGZF’s over the last 12 months.
COGZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CIOXY (71). This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to CIOXY’s over the last 12 months.
CIOXY's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as COGZF (66). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew similarly to COGZF’s over the last 12 months.
COGZF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CIOXY (72). This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to CIOXY’s over the last 12 months.
COGZF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CIOXY (28). This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to CIOXY’s over the last 12 months.
| CIOXY | COGZF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
CIOXY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIOXY has been loosely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIOXY jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIOXY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIOXY | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZS - CIOXY | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| SBIG - CIOXY | 30% Poorly correlated | -16.97% | ||
| GTLB - CIOXY | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
| COGZF - CIOXY | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| CYBR - CIOXY | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.31% | ||
More | ||||
COGZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that COGZF and CIOXY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COGZF and CIOXY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COGZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COGZF | 100% | +1.85% | ||
| CIOXY - COGZF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RAMP - COGZF | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.82% | ||
| CMPD - COGZF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CNSWF - COGZF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
| DASTF - COGZF | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.56% | ||
More | ||||