CION
Price
$9.83
Change
+$0.06 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
592.29M
31 days until earnings call
CLSPF
Price
$4.56
Change
-$0.19 (-4.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
29.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CION vs CLSPF

Header iconCION vs CLSPF Comparison
Open Charts CION vs CLSPFBanner chart's image
CION Investment
Price$9.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.61%)
Volume$123.2K
Capitalization592.29M
CANADIAN LIFE COS SPLIT
Price$4.56
Change-$0.19 (-4.00%)
Volume$3.82K
Capitalization29.39M
CION vs CLSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CION
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CION vs. CLSPF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CION is a Hold and CLSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CION: $9.83 vs. CLSPF: $4.56)
Brand notoriety: CION and CLSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CION: 40% vs. CLSPF: 343%
Market capitalization -- CION: $592.29M vs. CLSPF: $29.39M
CION [@Investment Managers] is valued at $592.29M. CLSPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $29.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CION’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CION’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CLSPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CION is a better buy in the long-term than CLSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CION’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CION’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CION is a better buy in the short-term than CLSPF.

Price Growth

CION (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.58% price change this week, while CLSPF (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

CION is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.41% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CION($592M) has a higher market cap than CLSPF($29.4M). CION has higher P/E ratio than CLSPF: CION (6.37) vs CLSPF (3.31). CLSPF YTD gains are higher at: -4.426 vs. CION (-7.361). CLSPF has more cash in the bank: 111M vs. CION (6.81M). CION has higher revenues than CLSPF: CION (107M) vs CLSPF (4.01M).
CIONCLSPFCION / CLSPF
Capitalization592M29.4M2,014%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.361-4.426166%
P/E Ratio6.373.31192%
Revenue107M4.01M2,668%
Total Cash6.81M111M6%
Total Debt1.08BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIONCLSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CION
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OTCNX77.041.04
+1.37%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap R
BUFEX57.580.57
+1.00%
Buffalo Blue Chip Growth
GTMRX18.600.17
+0.92%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth R
JLFSX12.430.09
+0.73%
JHancock Global Climate Action I
WHGOX12.250.04
+0.33%
Westwood Income Opportunity Ultra

CION and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CION has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CION jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CION
1D Price
Change %
CION100%
+0.61%
FSK - CION
74%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
FDUS - CION
72%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
BBDC - CION
71%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
NMFC - CION
71%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
TSLX - CION
71%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
More

CLSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSPF and ADLRF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSPF and ADLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSPF
1D Price
Change %
CLSPF100%
N/A
ADLRF - CLSPF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUCT - CLSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.58%
PVLUF - CLSPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BXSL - CLSPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
CION - CLSPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More