Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOIX vs HFQRX
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOIX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps Inst
Price$20.74
Change+$0.57 (+2.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets432.9M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.95
Change+$0.96 (+13.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOIX vs. HFQRX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOIX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 7.01B vs. CIOIX (433M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOIX: HFQRX (6.52) vs CIOIX (1.38). CIOIX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOIX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. CIOIX (67.00). CIOIX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.93 vs. CIOIX (33.20). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 75.20 vs. CIOIX (59.20).
| CIOIX | HFQRX | CIOIX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.304 | 8.607 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 433M | 7.01B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 6.52 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.20 | 36.93 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.64 | 61.08 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.20 | 75.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.07 | 131.51 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers