Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOIX vs HFQRX
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOIX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps Inst
Price$19.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets401.3M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.84B
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOIX vs. HFQRX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOIX is a Buy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.84B vs. CIOIX (401M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOIX: HFQRX (7.08) vs CIOIX (2.56). CIOIX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOIX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. CIOIX (67.00). CIOIX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.61 vs. CIOIX (24.50). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 62.92 vs. CIOIX (52.34).
| CIOIX | HFQRX | CIOIX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.064 | 28.029 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 6.84B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 7.08 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.50 | 27.61 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.97 | 51.10 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.34 | 62.92 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.89 | 96.20 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers