CINGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.53M
CMPD
Price
$3.94
Change
-$0.72 (-15.45%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINGF vs CMPD

Header iconCINGF vs CMPD Comparison
Open Charts CINGF vs CMPDBanner chart's image
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$345.92K
Capitalization12.53M
CompuMed
Price$3.94
Change-$0.72 (-15.45%)
Volume$152
Capitalization5.2M
CINGF vs CMPD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINGF vs. CMPD commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINGF is a Hold and CMPD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CINGF: $0.06 vs. CMPD: $3.94)
Brand notoriety: CINGF and CMPD are both not notable
CINGF represents the Packaged Software, while CMPD is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINGF: 13% vs. CMPD: 13%
Market capitalization -- CINGF: $12.53M vs. CMPD: $5.2M
CINGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $12.53M. CMPD’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $5.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMPD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CINGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMPD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPD is a better buy in the long-term than CINGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMPD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMPD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CINGF is a better buy in the short-term than CMPD.

Price Growth

CINGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while CMPD (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -16.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.30% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CINGF($12.5M) has a higher market cap than CMPD($5.2M). CINGF YTD gains are higher at: 19.499 vs. CMPD (3.412).
CINGFCMPDCINGF / CMPD
Capitalization12.5M5.2M240%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.4993.412571%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A190K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINGF vs CMPD: Fundamental Ratings
CINGF
CMPD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
253
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5037

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMPD's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CINGF (90). This means that CMPD’s stock grew similarly to CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPD (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CMPD’s over the last 12 months.

CMPD's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CINGF (69). This means that CMPD’s stock grew significantly faster than CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPD's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CINGF (42). This means that CMPD’s stock grew similarly to CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPD (16). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CMPD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINGFCMPD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESALF32.320.02
+0.06%
Eisai Co., Ltd.
HYSNF1.95N/A
N/A
Hysan Development Co., Ltd.
CBTN30.00N/A
N/A
Citizens Bancorp Investment, Inc.
DSAQU11.69N/A
N/A
Direct Selling Acquisition Corp.
DGNOF0.19N/A
-2.43%
Diagnos Inc.

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
-0.09%
VENZF - CINGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.97%
SWONF - CINGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPD - CINGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-15.45%
CDTAF - CINGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
BYSD - CINGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMPD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPD has been loosely correlated with OCLCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPD jumps, then OCLCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPD
1D Price
Change %
CMPD100%
-15.45%
OCLCF - CMPD
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMCUF - CMPD
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IARGF - CMPD
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COGZF - CMPD
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CINGF - CMPD
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More