It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CINF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRLI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CINF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RLI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.73% price change this week, while RLI (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +5.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.18%.
CINF is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
RLI is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
CINF | RLI | CINF / RLI | |
Capitalization | 19.5B | 6.79B | 287% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 48.658 | 33.297 | 146% |
P/E Ratio | 10.48 | 22.31 | 47% |
Revenue | 10B | 1.52B | 656% |
Total Cash | 14.7B | 1.03B | 1,422% |
Total Debt | 874M | 100M | 874% |
CINF | RLI | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CINF's Valuation (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RLI (90). This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RLI’s over the last 12 months.
RLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CINF (38). This means that RLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CINF’s over the last 12 months.
RLI's SMR Rating (38) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (60). This means that RLI’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as RLI (43). This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to RLI’s over the last 12 months.
RLI's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (84). This means that RLI’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.
CINF | RLI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago56% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 2 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago50% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago47% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then L could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CINF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CINF | 100% | -0.26% | ||
L - CINF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
AFG - CINF | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
HIG - CINF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
THG - CINF | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
RLI - CINF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RLI has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RLI jumps, then L could also see price increases.