Advertisement
CINF vs MVFD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a Hold and MVFD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CINF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CINF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CINF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CINF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.74% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
CINF is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.11% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
CINF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CINF | MVFD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 9 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACSI | 65.95 | 0.03 | +0.04% |
| American Customer Satisfaction ETF | |||
| ARKW | 170.33 | -0.46 | -0.27% |
| ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | |||
| WEBS | 18.76 | -0.16 | -0.85% |
| Direxion Daily Dow Jones Int Br 3X ETF | |||
| YBIT | 8.74 | -0.13 | -1.47% |
| YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| PTF | 77.76 | -1.25 | -1.59% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology MomtETF | |||
CINF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then L could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CINF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINF | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| L - CINF | 83% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| HIG - CINF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| THG - CINF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| ORI - CINF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| TRV - CINF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
MVFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MVFD has been loosely correlated with BRSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MVFD jumps, then BRSL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MVFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVFD | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| BRSL - MVFD | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| AOS - MVFD | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| LOW - MVFD | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| CINF - MVFD | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| WSM - MVFD | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||