CINF
Price
$163.44
Change
-$0.24 (-0.15%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.54B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
L
Price
$103.19
Change
-$0.41 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.41B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINF vs L

Header iconCINF vs L Comparison
Open Charts CINF vs LBanner chart's image
Cincinnati Financial
Price$163.44
Change-$0.24 (-0.15%)
Volume$11.74K
Capitalization25.54B
Loews
Price$103.19
Change-$0.41 (-0.40%)
Volume$3.84K
Capitalization21.41B
CINF vs L Comparison Chart in %
CINF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINF vs. L commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a Hold and L is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CINF: $163.68 vs. L: $103.60)
Brand notoriety: CINF and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINF: 106% vs. L: 117%
Market capitalization -- CINF: $25.54B vs. L: $21.41B
CINF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $25.54B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $21.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $120.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CINF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINF is a better buy in the long-term than L.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CINF is a better buy in the short-term than L.

Price Growth

CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.39% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

CINF is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.16% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CINF($25.5B) has a higher market cap than L($21.4B). L has higher P/E ratio than CINF: L (15.01) vs CINF (12.18). CINF YTD gains are higher at: 0.220 vs. L (-1.624). CINF has less debt than L: CINF (883M) vs L (9.44B). L has higher revenues than CINF: L (18B) vs CINF (12.1B).
CINFLCINF / L
Capitalization25.5B21.4B119%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.220-1.624-14%
P/E Ratio12.1815.0181%
Revenue12.1B18B67%
Total CashN/A7.22B-
Total Debt883M9.44B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINF vs L: Fundamental Ratings
CINF
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1570
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
238
SMR RATING
1..100
7597
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1321
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CINF's Valuation (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (76). This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (23). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's SMR Rating (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (52). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (21). This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CINF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRVR30.320.21
+0.71%
Pacer Benchmark Data&Infras RE SCTR ETF
XBTY11.270.03
+0.22%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
IAE7.940.01
+0.13%
VOYA ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY Income FUND
FLTR25.510.01
+0.04%
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
ARVR49.93-0.38
-0.76%
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF

CINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINF
1D Price
Change %
CINF100%
+1.66%
HIG - CINF
83%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
L - CINF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
TRV - CINF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
THG - CINF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
CNA - CINF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.81%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
CINF - L
83%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
TRV - L
78%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
ORI - L
78%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
More