It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CINF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CINF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KINS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.09% price change this week, while KINS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.08%.
CINF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
KINS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
CINF | KINS | CINF / KINS | |
Capitalization | 24B | 189M | 12,698% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 8.080 | -11.755 | -69% |
P/E Ratio | 13.31 | 6.52 | 204% |
Revenue | 11.7B | 186M | 6,290% |
Total Cash | 2.18B | 133M | 1,637% |
Total Debt | 884M | 5.06M | 17,467% |
CINF | KINS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CINF's Valuation (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (73) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (46) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.
KINS's SMR Rating (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CINF (78) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CINF’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (61) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for KINS (98) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew significantly faster than KINS’s over the last 12 months.
CINF | KINS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago59% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago52% | 2 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago59% | 2 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then L could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CINF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CINF | 100% | +0.07% | ||
L - CINF | 84% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
HIG - CINF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
ORI - CINF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
THG - CINF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
CNA - CINF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KINS has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KINS jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KINS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KINS | 100% | -2.55% | ||
SKWD - KINS | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
LMND - KINS | 35% Loosely correlated | +5.43% | ||
ORI - KINS | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
CINF - KINS | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
HMN - KINS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
More |