Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMFX vs PADEX
CIMFX vs PADEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMFX vs PADEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529F1
Price$26.86
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.73B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5
Price$22.55
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.86B
CIMFX vs PADEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMFX vs. PADEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMFX is a Buy and PADEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMFX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. PADEX (2.86B). CIMFX pays higher dividends than PADEX: CIMFX (3.81) vs PADEX (1.93). CIMFX was incepted earlier than PADEX: CIMFX (23 years) vs PADEX (13 years). PADEX (0.78) is less costly to investors than CIMFX (0.70). PADEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. CIMFX (92.00). PADEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMFX: PADEX (0) vs CIMFX (250). CIMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.76 vs. PADEX (7.61). CIMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.78 vs. PADEX (40.97).
| CIMFX | PADEX | CIMFX / PADEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.78 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.78 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.935 | 10.107 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 2.86B | 4,764% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 1.93 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.76 | 7.61 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.25 | 42.55 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.78 | 40.97 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.12 | 52.36 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement