Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMFX vs PADEX
CIMFX vs PADEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMFX vs PADEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529F1
Price$26.18
Change-$0.14 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.63B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5
Price$21.47
Change-$0.22 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.47B
CIMFX vs PADEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMFX vs. PADEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMFX is a Buy and PADEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. PADEX (2.47B). CIMFX pays higher dividends than PADEX: CIMFX (3.89) vs PADEX (2.01). CIMFX was incepted earlier than PADEX: CIMFX (23 years) vs PADEX (13 years). PADEX (0.78) is less costly to investors than CIMFX (0.70). PADEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. CIMFX (92.00). PADEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMFX: PADEX (0) vs CIMFX (250). CIMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. PADEX (2.07). CIMFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.59 vs. PADEX (41.51).
| CIMFX | PADEX | CIMFX / PADEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.78 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.78 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.101 | 4.834 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 2.47B | 5,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.89 | 2.01 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 2.07 | 667% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.06 | 39.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.59 | 41.51 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.59 | 43.66 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement