Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMFX vs FTASX
CIMFX vs FTASX Comparison
Open Charts CIMFX vs FTASX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529F1
Price$26.18
Change-$0.14 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.63B
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$28.59
Change-$0.28 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.85B
CIMFX vs FTASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMFX vs. FTASX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMFX is a Buy and FTASX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FTASX (6.85B). CIMFX pays higher dividends than FTASX: CIMFX (3.89) vs FTASX (1.25). CIMFX was incepted earlier than FTASX: CIMFX (23 years) vs FTASX (17 years). FTASX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CIMFX (0.70). CIMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTASX (14.00). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMFX: FTASX (0) vs CIMFX (250). CIMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. FTASX (5.76). CIMFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.59 vs. FTASX (37.41).
| CIMFX | FTASX | CIMFX / FTASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.18 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.18 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.101 | 4.802 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 6.85B | 1,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.89 | 1.25 | 312% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 5.76 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.06 | 27.53 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.59 | 37.41 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.59 | 46.57 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers