Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMFX vs FCASX
CIMFX vs FCASX Comparison
Open Charts CIMFX vs FCASX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529F1
Price$26.79
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.54B
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
Price$29.52
Change+$0.12 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.11B
CIMFX vs FCASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMFX vs. FCASX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMFX is a Buy and FCASX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMFX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FCASX (7.11B). CIMFX pays higher dividends than FCASX: CIMFX (3.81) vs FCASX (0.69). CIMFX was incepted earlier than FCASX: CIMFX (23 years) vs FCASX (17 years). FCASX (1.68) is less costly to investors than CIMFX (0.70). CIMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FCASX (14.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMFX: FCASX (0) vs CIMFX (250). CIMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.44 vs. FCASX (7.67). CIMFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.37 vs. FCASX (35.18).
| CIMFX | FCASX | CIMFX / FCASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.643 | 8.330 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 7.11B | 1,913% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 0.69 | 552% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.44 | 7.67 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.52 | 27.91 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.37 | 35.18 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.31 | 50.20 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers