Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMEX vs WASCX
CIMEX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMEX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529E
Price$26.02
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.53B
Nomura Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$20.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
CIMEX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMEX vs. WASCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMEX is a Hold and WASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMEX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. WASCX (1.83B). CIMEX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMEX (3.28) vs WASCX (0.72). CIMEX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMEX (24 years) vs WASCX (31 years). WASCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than CIMEX (0.83). WASCX (67.00) and CIMEX (65.00) have comparable annual turnover. CIMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMEX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. WASCX (4.84). CIMEX return over 5 years is better than : 29.61 vs. WASCX (-2.76).
| CIMEX | WASCX | CIMEX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.87 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.87 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.191 | 6.219 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 1.83B | 7,650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.28 | 0.72 | 458% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 4.84 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.36 | 29.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.61 | -2.76 | -1,074% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.61 | 2.92 | 2,450% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement