Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FSBLX
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FSBLX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.64
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.38B
Federated Hermes Global Allocation R6
Price$22.41
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets288.35M
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FSBLX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FSBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FSBLX (288M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than FSBLX: CIMCX (2.90) vs FSBLX (2.40). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FSBLX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FSBLX (10 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSBLX (1.11). FSBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). FSBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FSBLX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FSBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.85 vs. CIMCX (13.02). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.73 vs. FSBLX (11.47).
| CIMCX | FSBLX | CIMCX / FSBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.84 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.11 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.580 | 1.633 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 288M | 48,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 2.40 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 14.85 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.78 | 34.14 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.73 | 11.47 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers