Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.75
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.54B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.01M
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FQTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FQTEX (384M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.04) vs CIMCX (2.95). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (23 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and CIMCX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.31 vs. CIMCX (14.36). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 78.40 vs. CIMCX (44.48).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.11 | 1,236% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.127 | 11.248 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 384M | 35,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 6.04 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.36 | 15.31 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.96 | 43.96 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.48 | 78.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement