Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$27.04
Change-$0.27 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.38B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$14.44
Change+$0.76 (+5.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets513.58M
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FQTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FQTEX (514M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.38) vs CIMCX (2.81). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FQTEX (7 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.08). FQTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.40 vs. CIMCX (65.00). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.18 vs. CIMCX (11.59). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 69.74 vs. CIMCX (29.48).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.08 | 1,688% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.120 | 3.700 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 514M | 27,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.81 | 6.38 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | 22.18 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.06 | 45.67 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.48 | 69.74 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers