Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.53B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$14.13
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets488.66M
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FQTEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FQTEX (489M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.13) vs CIMCX (2.79). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FQTEX (7 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.40 vs. CIMCX (65.00). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.34 vs. CIMCX (8.03). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 70.38 vs. CIMCX (26.59).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.11 | 1,227% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.918 | 20.490 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 489M | 28,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 6.13 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.03 | 19.34 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.60 | 49.98 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.59 | 70.38 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers