Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$27.49
Change-$0.20 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.2B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.11M
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FQTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FQTEX (454M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.39) vs CIMCX (2.85). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. CIMCX (10.78). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.69 vs. CIMCX (37.97).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.11 | 1,227% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.509 | 16.653 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 454M | 30,837% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 6.39 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 14.22 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.10 | 41.79 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.97 | 66.69 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement