Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.73B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets399.29M
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FQTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FQTEX (399M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.04) vs CIMCX (2.95). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (23 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and CIMCX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.51 vs. CIMCX (12.70). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 75.59 vs. CIMCX (41.12).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.11 | 1,236% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.376 | 11.997 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 399M | 34,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 6.04 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 14.51 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.69 | 42.03 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.12 | 75.59 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers