Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$27.34
Change+$0.09 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.1B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income R6
Price$2.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.96M
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FGGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FGGBX (310M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FGGBX (3.30) vs CIMCX (2.84). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.97 vs. CIMCX (8.50). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.15 vs. FGGBX (31.27).
| CIMCX | FGGBX | CIMCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.89 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.96 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.049 | 21.037 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 310M | 44,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 3.30 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.50 | 13.97 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.75 | 56.18 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.15 | 31.27 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.50 | 26.78 | 256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement