Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.53B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income R6
Price$2.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.61M
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FGGBX (318M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FGGBX (4.20) vs CIMCX (2.79). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FGGBX (13 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.73 vs. CIMCX (8.03). CIMCX (26.59) and FGGBX (25.86) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIMCX | FGGBX | CIMCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.89 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.96 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.918 | 27.262 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 318M | 44,025% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 4.20 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.03 | 26.73 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.60 | 47.01 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.59 | 25.86 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.49 | 39.24 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers