Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs WASCX
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.44
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.68B
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$21.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. WASCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and WASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. WASCX (1.83B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMAX (3.55) vs WASCX (0.72). CIMAX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs WASCX (31 years). WASCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMAX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.18 vs. WASCX (4.85). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.48 vs. WASCX (11.48).
| CIMAX | WASCX | CIMAX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.871 | 13.938 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 1.83B | 7,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 0.72 | 490% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.18 | 4.85 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.11 | 26.13 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.48 | 11.48 | 396% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.45 | 2.94 | 2,801% |