Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs WASCX
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.22
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.15B
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$21.29
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. WASCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and WASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. WASCX (1.83B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMAX (3.58) vs WASCX (0.75). CIMAX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs WASCX (30 years). WASCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WASCX (67.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMAX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.36 vs. WASCX (8.30). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.95 vs. WASCX (10.38).
| CIMAX | WASCX | CIMAX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.253 | 12.373 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 1.83B | 7,495% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 0.75 | 478% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.36 | 8.30 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 16.37 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.95 | 10.38 | 433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.98 | 5.10 | 1,685% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement