Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs WASCX
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.11
Change-$0.26 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.38B
Nomura Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$20.47
Change-$1.08 (-5.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. WASCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and WASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. WASCX (1.85B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMAX (3.51) vs WASCX (0.65). CIMAX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs WASCX (31 years). WASCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). WASCX (67.00) and CIMAX (65.00) have comparable annual turnover. CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMAX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.41 vs. WASCX (5.56). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.49 vs. WASCX (-2.81).
| CIMAX | WASCX | CIMAX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.149 | 2.658 | 156% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 1.85B | 7,522% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 0.65 | 539% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.41 | 5.56 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.02 | 24.16 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.49 | -2.81 | -1,226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.29 | 13.57 | 695% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement