Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs WASCX
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.53B
Nomura Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$20.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. WASCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and WASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. WASCX (1.83B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMAX (3.49) vs WASCX (0.72). CIMAX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs WASCX (31 years). WASCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). WASCX (67.00) and CIMAX (65.00) have comparable annual turnover. CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMAX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. WASCX (4.84). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.14 vs. WASCX (-2.76).
| CIMAX | WASCX | CIMAX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.429 | 6.219 | 152% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 1.83B | 7,650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 0.72 | 487% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.76 | 4.84 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.27 | 29.69 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.14 | -2.76 | -1,130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.76 | 2.92 | 2,592% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement