Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs WASCX
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.14B
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$21.07
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. WASCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a StrongBuy and WASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. WASCX (1.82B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMAX (3.67) vs WASCX (0.76). CIMAX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs WASCX (30 years). WASCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WASCX (67.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMAX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.86 vs. WASCX (5.12). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.37 vs. WASCX (9.99).
| CIMAX | WASCX | CIMAX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.172 | 11.212 | 109% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 1.82B | 7,473% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.67 | 0.76 | 485% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.86 | 5.12 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.62 | 10.99 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.37 | 9.99 | 434% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.84 | -3.27 | -2,317% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement