Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs WASAX
CIMAX vs WASAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs WASAX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.44
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.61B
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl A
Price$24.16
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
CIMAX vs WASAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. WASAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and WASAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. WASAX (1.83B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than WASAX: CIMAX (3.55) vs WASAX (1.17). CIMAX was incepted earlier than WASAX: CIMAX (24 years) vs WASAX (25 years). WASAX (1.12) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). WASAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIMAX (4%) vs CIMAX (4%). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASAX: CIMAX (250) vs WASAX (1000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.18 vs. WASAX (6.32). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.48 vs. WASAX (19.11).
| CIMAX | WASAX | CIMAX / WASAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.12 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.12 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.871 | 14.650 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 1.83B | 7,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 1.17 | 304% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.18 | 6.32 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.11 | 31.96 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.48 | 19.11 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.45 | 14.17 | 582% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement